• Users Online: 655
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 
Table of Contents
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 38  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 131-141

Skin manifestation and diagnosis of febrile diseases by COVID-19 and other ribonucleic acid viruses: The diagnostic clues


1 Department of Dermatology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
2 Department of Dermatology, National Taiwan University Hospital; Department of Dermatology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan

Date of Submission03-May-2020
Date of Decision03-Jun-2020
Date of Acceptance04-Jun-2020
Date of Web Publication10-Sep-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Tsen-Fang Tsai
Department of Dermatology, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7 Chung San South Road, Taipei
Taiwan
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ds.ds_32_20

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Many febrile diseases caused by ribonucleic acid virus infection demonstrate cutaneous manifestations with preceding prodromes. This review provides a flowchart highlighting the diagnostic clues of viral exanthem. Besides febrile prodromes, patients with chikungunya virus have severe arthralgias and macular hyperpigmentation on the noses. Coronavirus disease 2019 demonstrates unique acrocyanosis and pseudofrostbite besides erythematous rash and urticaria, suggesting abnormal coagulation. Dengue fever should be suspected when patients in the tropical region present with biphasic fever, headache, retroorbital pain, and centrifugal morbilliform rash. Dengue hemorrhagic fever, a potentially fatal complication, results from systemic vascular leakage. High-temperature fever and sudden-onset severe headache raise the possibility of Ebola virus infection. Patients with hand-foot-and-mouth disease may experience morbilliform or vesicular eruption, especially over the hands, feet, and oral mucosa. In acute human immunodeficiency virus infection, maculopapular eruptions often appear on the face and neck after prodromes. Primary human T-lymphotropic-III virus infection can induce widespread maculopapular or roseola-like exanthem, sparing the hands and feet. Cutaneous manifestations of rotavirus include generalized maculopapular rash, Sweet's syndrome, Henoch–Schonlein purpura, Gianotti–Crosti syndrome, and acute hemorrhagic edema. Rubella is usually suspected when low-grade fever and lymphadenopathy are accompanied by a discrete pinpoint-sized maculopapular rash, which spreads and diminishes faster than measles. Cough, coryza, and conjunctivitis followed by morbilliform eruptions and Koplik's spots are diagnostic of measles. Exanthem of Zika virus comprised of small pruritic papules that extend downwards. Laboratory testing is helpful in making a definitive diagnosis. Viral isolation, measurement of immunoglobulin M (IgM) or IgG, and/or reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction are useful diagnostic tools with favorable sensitivity and specificity.

Keywords: Chikungunya fever; Chikungunya virus; coronavirus disease 2019; COVID-19; Dengue fever; Dengue hemorrhagic fever; Dengue virus; Ebola virus; exanthem; Hand-foot-and-mouth disease; HFMD; HIV; HTLV-III; Human immunodeficiency virus; Human T-lymphotropic virus-III; Measles; RNA virus; Rotavirus; Rubella; SARS-CoV-2; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; Zika virus


How to cite this article:
Huang YW, Tsai TF. Skin manifestation and diagnosis of febrile diseases by COVID-19 and other ribonucleic acid viruses: The diagnostic clues. Dermatol Sin 2020;38:131-41

How to cite this URL:
Huang YW, Tsai TF. Skin manifestation and diagnosis of febrile diseases by COVID-19 and other ribonucleic acid viruses: The diagnostic clues. Dermatol Sin [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 19];38:131-41. Available from: http://www.dermsinica.org/text.asp?2020/38/3/131/294710




  Introduction Top


Viral exanthems are great imitators. Due to the universal vaccination in childhood, classic viral exanthems are becoming less common. However, recent outbreaks of measles reiterate the importance of our understanding of the cutaneous presentation of the viral exanthems.[1] Other than the classical viral infection, more novel viral infections with skin eruptions are emerging, and some of them are caused by ribonucleic acid (RNA) virus.

A novel febrile disease that presents with rashes is coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which caught global attention recently. Some RNA virus infections with rashes, including O'nyong'nyong virus, Mayaro virus, and Ross River virus, will not be discussed due to the rarity and endemic nature. These viruses belong to arthritogenic alphaviruses, similar to chikungunya virus, which will be discussed. Leishmania RNA virus can exacerbate the cutaneous manifestation of Leishmaniasis. However, this manuscript focuses on the skin manifestations caused by the RNA virus itself. Therefore, it is not included in the discussion.

Morbilliform rash is the prototype of viral exanthems, and “morbilliform eruption” literally means resembling the rashes of measles. It is characterized by generalized fine maculopapular erythematous eruptions that are usually symmetrically distributed. A morbilliform rash may be part of the symptoms and signs of many viral infections and drug eruptions. The cutaneous manifestations of other RNA viruses may simulate the classic viral exanthems but often show some additional features. Early recognition and differentiation of these viral exanthems are essential to direct further investigations and initiate treatment. In this review, we focus on febrile exanthems caused by RNA viruses, and we offer clues for the differential diagnosis and proper diagnostic testing in such cases.


  Chikungunya Virus Top


Chikungunya fever is a mosquito-borne single-stranded viral disease mainly affecting patients living or traveling to an endemic tropical area. The disease was first detected in 1952 in Tanzania.[2] Chikungunya means 'to walk bent over' in Tanzanian's language, which refers to the stooped posture caused by arthritic symptoms.[3] There were outbreaks across Asia, Latin America, and the United States in recent years. It is a febrile illness characterized by severe arthralgias, myalgias, headaches, photophobia, and skin rash.[3] The exanthem of chikungunya fever is observed in 30%–75% of patients and usually presents 2–5 days after the fever onset.[4] The most typical cutaneous manifestation is a morbilliform rash, occurring primarily over the face, trunk, and upper extremities.[5] Macular hyperpigmentation of the nose, face, or hands is the second-most characteristic cutaneous eruptions.[4] This peculiar nasal pigmentation is called “chik sign.”[5] Other cutaneous manifestations include, in descending order, vesicles, and bullae, desquamation, toxic epidermal necrolysis-like, papular, urticarial, and purpuric lesions.[5] Oral mucosa involvements are found in the form of ulcerations, erosions, and cheilitis.[5] Nail findings in chikungunya infection demonstrate pigmentation, scattered leukonychia, and partial nail loss at a late stage.[6]

The characteristic histopathology findings of the morbilliform rashes in chikungunya fever are spongiosis, dermal edema, and perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate in the dermis.[5] Skin biopsies of the vesiculobullous lesions show intraepidermal or subepidermal bullae, with exocytosis of lymphocytes, perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate, acantholysis, necrotic keratinocytes, and occasional neutrophils.[7] The hyperpigmented lesions demonstrate increased basal pigmentation, pigmentary incontinence, and melanophages.[8]

Immunoglobulin (Ig) M antibody levels peak within three to 5 weeks after the initial manifestation and last for about 2 months.[4] Therefore, samples collected in the 1st week should include both serological tests and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).[9] Chikungunya IgG antibodies are positive after the 1st week and persist for years.[4] Serial samples revealing 4-fold IgG antibody titer increase are suggestive of chikungunya infection, as in the Dengue virus, and Zika virus.[4]


  Covid-19 Top


COVID-19 is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a single-stranded RNA virus. Clinical presentations of COVID-19 include fever, fatigue, dry cough, anorexia, dyspnea, rhinorrhea, ageusia, and anosmia.[10]

Recalcati analyzed 148 patients tested positive of SARS-CoV-2.[11] After excluding patients who had initiated new medication in the past 15 days, 18 out of 88 patients had cutaneous manifestations, including erythematous rash, widespread urticaria, and chickenpox-like vesicles. The time of viremia and skin manifestation may be different among diseases. There is no sufficient data to conclude the temporal relation between SARS-CoV-2 viremia and skin eruptions, but preliminary data showed that eight patients developed exanthem at the disease onset, and ten patients developed during hospitalization. Frostbite-like painful erythema, livedo, petechiae, and acrocyanosis have also been described.[12],[13] The acro-ischemic lesions occur on the feet and hands of children and adolescents. These painful, well-demarcated, reddish-purple lesions may develop into bullae or blackish crusts, followed by self-healing within 2 weeks.[14]

Histopathological findings of patients with COVID-19 demonstrated perivascular infiltration of inflammatory cells, fibrinoid necrosis, and thrombus formation, which are similar to those of SARS.[15] Immunohistochemistry test of monoclonal antibody against nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV-2 and RNA polymerase showed positive staining at sweat glands,[15] indicating infection at cutaneous skin appendages. These findings may correlate with case reports of patients developing clinically significant coagulopathy, antiphospholipid antibodies, multiple infarcts, and even gangrene.[16] However, whether these vascular abnormalities represented direct cytopathic effects of the viruses or were the complication of disseminated coagulopathies due to secondary infections remained to be studied.


  Dengue Virus Top


Dengue fever is a mosquito-borne, single-stranded viral disease caused by any of the four serologic distinct RNA viruses that belong to the Flaviviridae family.[4] Although infection with one serotype produces lifelong immunity to that serotype, the protection to other types are transient.[17] Classic dengue fever consists of fever, headache, retroorbital eye pain, myalgia and arthralgia, and skin rash.[17] The peak of viremia occurred 2 days before the fever. Transient flushing erythema of the face, neck, and chest at the initial phase of febrile onset can be followed by a second rash in three to 6 days.[9] At this stage, the centrifugal morbilliform rash involves the face, abdomen, and extremities with sparing of the palms and sole.[17] When these individual lesions coalesce and form generalized erythema around the unaffected white area, they appear as “white islands in a sea of red”[9] [Figure 1]a. This faint morbilliform rash is observed in more than 50% of patients with dengue fever.[4] A fine macule over pressure areas, especially the palms and soles, may erupt before the onset of fever[18] [Figure 2]. Some patients develop mild hemorrhagic manifestations, including petechiae, purpura, or ecchymosis, particularly at sites of venipunctures[17] [Figure 1]b. The petechiae can be better demonstrated with tourniquet test, using pressure between systemic and diastolic pressure for 5 min. Oral mucosa involvement was rarely reported in the literature, but gingival bleeding may sometimes present.[19] In a report recruiting 45 patients from Southern Taiwan, 71% developed skin rashes, and these patients were younger, experienced more pruritus, and had more swollen palms/sole than those without exanthem.[20]
Figure 1:(a) Morbilliform eruptions coalesce and form generalized erythema around the unaffected white area, showing a “white islands in a sea of red” appearance suggestive of dengue fever. (b) Petechiae over the extremities, one of the mild hemorrhagic manifestations of dengue fever, may be seen in some patients

Click here to view
Figure 2:Some patients with Dengue fever present with erythematous macules over pressure areas, especially the palms (a) and soles (b)

Click here to view


The disease may progress to life-threatening dengue hemorrhagic fever, which leads to noninfectious bleeding, thrombocytopenia, and leakage of plasma.[19] Dengue hemorrhagic fever and dengue shock syndrome are caused by systemic vascular leakage associated with secondary-type dengue antibody response, especially in children.[21] Dengue hemorrhagic fever is more often observed in dengue virus type 2 infections than those due to type 1 and 3.[21] The mortality rate of dengue hemorrhagic fever was reported to be 38.7% in southern Taiwan in 2015.[22]

Skin biopsy of dengue fever reveals swelling of the endothelial cells in small vessels of the papillary dermis, transendothelial cell diapedesis of neutrophils, extravasation of erythrocytes, and perivascular mononuclear cells infiltration.[23]

Clinical test methods for dengue fever include virus isolation, direct detection of viral RNA, detection of the secreted NS1 protein, or measurement of virus-specific IgM (≥4 days after fever onset).[24] Virus isolation is definitive, but requires days to weeks to perform.[24]


  Ebola Virus Top


Zaire ebolavirus, also known as the Ebola virus, is a filovirus with single-stranded RNA genomes belonging to the Filoviridae family.[25] Fruit bats are the likely reservoir, and human infection occurs through contact with infected animals or by person-to-person contact.[26] High-temperature fever with abrupt onset, severe headache, myalgia, arthralgia, generalized fatigue, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and vomiting are the characteristic manifestations of Ebola virus infection.[26] Muscle and joint pain are almost always present. The headache located primarily in the occipital region and may spread to the frontal or parietal area.[26] The skin rash of Ebola virus infection is often a nonpruritic, dark-red, maculopapular eruption with fine scaling that appears between day four and six of disease, which is described as “ghost-like” appearance.[25],[26] The rash initially appears on the upper arms and upper legs, and gradually spread in a centripetal fashion.[25] At this stage, nervous system involvement, petechiae, melena, hematemesis, hematuria, hemoptysis, and hemorrhage may also be found.[25] The rash becomes generalized and dusky in about 8 days, and then the erythema clears with desquamation.[25]

Biopsy of the skin eruptions shows minimal nonspecific alterations with various degrees of dermal edema, focal hemorrhage, and endothelial cell swelling and necrosis.[26]

Ebola virus can be detected by serum IgM and IgG using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique; however, primary infection-induced antibodies only become detectable approximately 3 weeks later.[27] Therefore, the diagnosis relies on the detection of Ebola viral proteins or RNA sequences using RT-PCR techniques.[28] Both tests are suitable for emergent diagnosis, as virus levels in the serum increase rapidly within the first few days of infection.[28] Specific immunohistochemical assays can be performed on formalin-fixed skin specimens to diagnose Ebola virus infection.[29]


  Hand-Foot-And-Mouth Disease Top


Hand-foot-and-mouth disease (HFMD) is a self-limiting febrile illness with acral/oral involvement. It is commonly observed among young children and infants, but adults can also be affected.[30] Typical HFMD presents as fever along with morbilliform or vesicular eruptions limited to the hands, feet, and oral mucosa[9] [Figure 3]. Lesions can also present in other sites, including the buttocks, extremities, and torso.[30] The rash usually onsets in 3–6 days.[30]
Figure 3: A 42-year-old woman presented with variously-sized, erythematous macules on the soles (a) and palms (b) following contact with a child with HFMD. Fever and sore throat developed one week before the exanthem

Click here to view


The causative virus of HFMD belongs to the nonpolio enterovirus genus (single-stranded).[9] Classic HFMD is most commonly caused by coxsackievirus-A16 and enterovirus 71.[30] Coxsackievirus-A6 has been recognized as the leading cause of atypical HFMD, which is associated with generalized vesiculobullous eruptions that may ulcerate, prominent perioral involvement, and onychomadesis.[31] Echovirus can also cause HFMD, and sometimes induce complications such as aseptic meningitis or encephalitis.[9]

Distinctive histologic features were found in the biopsies of adult patients with HFMD. Spongiosis, neutrophilic exocytosis, massive keratinocyte necrosis, and ballooning were present in the upper epidermis, with vacuolization of basal cells, necrotic cells in follicles and sweat glands.[32] Cytotoxic T cells with strong granulysin expression comprised the main component of inflammatory infiltration.[32] Despite some similar histopathological findings, the number of neutrophils is significantly more numerous and necrosis is more extensive in the upper part of the epidermis in HFMD when compared to erythema multiforme.[33]

Enterovirus 71-IgM-capture ELISA was reported to reach 97.7% sensitivity and 93.3% specificity, with most specimens taken within a week after the onset of symptoms.[34] A novel method to detect enterovirus 71 infections with IgA in the saliva is promising, as it demonstrated similar sensitivity and specificity compared to detecting IgM in the serum.[35] Besides, the former is less invasive and shows a higher sensitivity in detecting secondary infections.[35] Although the IgM anti-coxsackievirus-A16 assay demonstrated favorable sensitivity and specificity, RT-PCR is often a better diagnostic tool for coxsackievirus-A6.[36] RT-PCR can help the rapid diagnosis of enterovirus, coxsackievirus, or echovirus infection. The use of RT-PCR has been associated with reduced duration of empirical antimicrobial therapy and length of hospital stay.[36]


  Human Immunodeficiency Virus Top


Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is a member of the genus Lentivirus, which transmits as a single-stranded enveloped RNA virus and reverse transcribes into double-stranded DNA upon entry into the target cell. Manifestations of primary HIV infection include fever, lymphadenopathy, pharyngitis, myalgia, arthralgia, headache, gastrointestinal, and central nervous system symptoms.[37] Approximately 77% of patients experience primary skin eruptions after HIV infection.[37] Acute infection with HIV can cause 5-10 mm-sized, well-defined, round to oval, erythematous maculopapular eruptions most often on the face and neck, although the palms and soles, and extremities can be involved.[37] Sometimes a hemorrhagic or necrotic center can be observed. Oral lesions are usually present, ranging from erythema to ulcers.[37] Along with dull-red and violaceous maculopapular lesions and enanthem, acute genitocrural intertrigo has been reported as an early cutaneous feature for HIV infection.[38] The skin manifestation initiates 3 days after the fever and usually lasts approximately 1 week before gradually resolves.[9]

The exanthem of acute HIV infection cannot be diagnosed specifically through histopathological examination, but a characteristic histopathological picture may suggest the diagnosis in an appropriate clinical context.[39] Similar to other maculopapular eruptions due to viral infections, histopathology features of maculopapular rash in the acute phase of HIV infection are sparse perivascular infiltration of lymphocytes and histiocytes in the upper dermis.[40] The skin biopsy of an acutely infected patient shows interface dermatitis and diffuse vacuolization of the basal cell layer.[40]

Although a variety of laboratory investigations are available for HIV infection, a particular test should be chosen based on understanding the timeline of virological and serological events as well as the difference between laboratory-based and point-of-care tests.[41] According to the diagnostic algorithm proposed by Hurt et al.,[41] HIV-1/2 Ag/Ab combination immunoassays (p24/IgM/IgG sensitive) in combination with an IgG sensitive HIV-1/2 antibody differentiation supplemental assay is favored in most clinical scenarios. The median window period is 17.8 days for HIV p24/IgM/IgG sensitive laboratory tests, and 23.1 days for IgM/IgG sensitive laboratory tests.[41]


  Human T-Lymphotropic Virus Top


Primary infection with the human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV)-III, a single-stranded RNA virus, was documented to present as fever, rigors, arthralgias and myalgias, abdominal cramps, and diarrhea. Cutaneous manifestations include maculopapular rash and urticaria.[42] Lindskov et al. described patients with HTLV-III with roseola-like rash on the face, trunk, and extremities, sparing the hands and feet.[43] The estimated incubation period was four to 6 weeks, while the symptoms lasted 2–3 weeks.[42] Seroconversion occurred 8–12 weeks after exposure.[42] In some cases, Western blotting was able to detect HTLV-III antibodies earlier.[44]


  Measles (Rubeola) Top


Measles virus, a single-stranded member of the Paramyxoviridae family, usually causes stepwise fever, malaise, and weight loss, accompanied by cough, coryza, and conjunctivitis, known as the “3C”. Morbilliform rash is the prototype of viral exanthems, and “morbilliform eruption” literally means resembling the rashes of measles. A morbilliform rash may be part of the symptoms and signs of many viral infections and drug eruptions. The characteristic exanthem of measles consists of erythematous, 2–10 mm-sized macular lesions and 1-3 mm-sized papules with healthy-looking intervening skin. The maculopapular rash may become confluent 4 days later.[45] The exanthem of measles usually develops three to 5 days after prodromal symptoms, which is consistent with the surge of the level of measles RNA.[46] Characteristic erythematous macules and papules develop on the face and spread cephalocaudally, which heals with hyperpigmentation after 5–7 days.[45] The rashes of measles are usually only mildly itchy or not itchy at all. Koplik's spots [Figure 4] are the pathognomonic sign of measles during the prodromal period, appearing in more than 70% of patients.[9] They appear as bluish-white plaques about 2-4 mm in size on an erythematous base on the buccal mucosa, typically molar and pre-molar areas, but may also occur on the lips, gingiva, conjunctival folds or vaginal mucosa.[47] Patchy erythema with tiny white specks (grains of salt) appearance became evident when the lesions increase in numbers. Koplik's spots usually resolve by the peak of the exanthem.[45]
Figure 4: (a) White arrows indicate white plaques on an erythematous base on the right buccal mucosa, showing a characteristic “grains of salt” appearance of measles. (b) A case of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction confirmed measles virus infection presented with Koplik's spots on the vaginal mucosa

Click here to view


The histopathological features of cutaneous lesions in measles are quite distinctive. It is composed of multinucleated keratinocytes, individual and clustered necrotic keratinocytes in the epidermis.[48] Pronounced folliculosebaceous and acrosyringeal involvement are usually found.[48] The histopathological findings of Koplick spots show multinucleated T-lymphocytes, also known as Warthin–Finkeldey cells, and neutrophils.[49] Warthin–Finkeldey cells [Figure 5] are grape-like clusters of dozens of small nuclei, surrounded by a small amount of eosinophilic or basophilic cytoplasm.[49] The nuclei often resemble those of lymphocytes. The cells rarely contain inclusion bodies. Warthin–Finkeldey giant cells are not specific for measles but are associated with reactive lymphatic proliferation.[50]
Figure 5: Black arrows point out the multinucleated T-lymphocytes, also known as Warthin–Finkeldey cells, which consists of grape-like clusters of dozens of small nuclei, surrounded by a small amount of eosinophilic or basophilic cytoplasm

Click here to view


Measles is usually diagnosed clinically based on characteristic mucocutaneous findings. If necessary, a blood test can be performed to confirm the diagnosis. Serologic examinations are highly sensitive and specific for measles. Both IgM and IgG antibodies are produced during the primary immune response and can be detected in the serum within a few days after rash onset.[51] The sensitivity of ELISA for measles IgM can reach 90% at 3 days post rash onset.[51] In the serum, IgM antibody levels peak in 7–10 days and then decline rapidly, being barely detectable after 6–8 weeks.[51] IgG antibody levels increase in the beginning 4 weeks and remain detectable persistently.[51] Serum IgA and secretory IgA antibodies are also produced. The measles virus can also be isolated from blood, urine, and nasopharynx.[51]


  Rotavirus Top


Rotavirus belongs to the Reoviridae family, with a genome consisting of eleven double-stranded RNA.[52] The incubation period for rotavirus infections is usually <48 h.[52] The characteristic symptoms of rotavirus gastroenteritis are vomiting, abdominal pain, and low-grade fever, followed by watery, foul-smelling diarrhea for 4–8 days.[52],[53] A generalized erythematous maculopapular exanthem has been reported to be associated with rotavirus infection.[52] Other cutaneous manifestations include Sweet's syndrome,[54] Henoch–Schonlein purpura,[53] Gianotti–Crosti syndrome,[52] and acute hemorrhagic edema.[52] Rotavirus antigen has been identified in the patient's serum 3–7 days after disease onset, but at present, routine diagnostic testing is based primarily on stool specimens.[55] ELISA tests are widely used to screen for rotavirus infection, while RT-PCR is an alternative.


  Rubella (German Measles) Top


Rubella virus, a single-stranded virus, belongs to the Togaviridae family. Patients with rubella may manifest with a prodrome of low-grade fever and lymphadenopathy. The postauricular, posterior cervical, and suboccipital lymph nodes are often involved. The rubella exanthem [Figure 6] is often the first clinical sign of infection.[45] The nonpruritic rubelliform rash consists of discrete, rose-pink, pinpoint-sized maculopapules which first appears on the face, then spreads downward and becomes generalized within about 24 h. The rash then fades in the same fashion as it spreads, lasting at most 3 days.[45] Hence, rubella is nicknamed “three days measles”. Although the distributions of measles and rubella exanthem are similar, the spread of rubella is much more rapid. Besides, the rash of rubella is usually fainter and less infiltrated than the exanthem of measles.[9] Furthermore, the rash seen in rubella does not darken or coalesce but rather evolves rapidly and become delicate, flaky desquamation with only rare postinflammatory hyperpigmentation.[9] Forchheimer spots and nonexudative conjunctivitis may develop in 20% of patients.[45] Forchheimer spots consist of pinpoint petechiae or red macules on the soft palate.[45]
Figure 6: A 21-year-old woman with rubella complained of general malaise, cough, rhinorrhea, sore throat, injected conjunctiva with minimal discharge, and myalgia, followed by rashes spreading cephalocaudally. Discrete, rose-pink, pinpoint-sized maculopapules distributed on the back. Note that the rash of rubella is usually fainter and less infiltrated than measles

Click here to view


Histopathological examination of rubella reveals distinctive features compared to measles. While the latter shows interface dermatitis, inflammatory cell infiltration in rubella is restricted to the perivascular area.[56]

The most common diagnostic method for rubella infection is the serologic investigation.[9] The level of IgM antibodies should be measured, as the presence of IgG may result from earlier vaccination. In a previous report comparing different assays for the detection of anti-rubella IgM antibodies, the sensitivity and specificity can reach up to 96.5% and 100%, respectively.[57] However, samples taken in <7 days after the rash onset showed a suboptimal detection rate of rubella.[58] Depending on the clinical scenario and the laboratory medicine department, RT-PCR can be performed for the diagnosis of rubella virus infection in selected cases and the prenatal diagnosis of congenital rubella syndrome.[9] The virus can be demonstrated in the skin with and without eruptions.[59]


  Zika Virus Top


Zika virus is a single-stranded RNA flavivirus, which is primarily transmitted through mosquitoes.[4] Approximately 80% of patients with acute infection of the Zika virus are asymptomatic, while others experience mild fever, muscle and joint pains, nonpurulent conjunctivitis, headache, retroorbital pain, and vomiting.[9] Fever is often low-grade or even absent, making skin rashes the hallmark clue for clinicians to suspect Zika virus infection. Skin manifestation is observed in 90% of febrile patients with Zika virus, initiating in one to 4 days after extracutaneous symptoms, and usually lasts 6 days.[4] Pruritic morbilliform eruptions predominantly appear on the trunk and extremities and palms and soles.[4],[9] Despite being described as maculopapular in character, the skin lesions are distinctly comprised of small papules.[60] The skin involvement typically begins on the face and extends downward to the trunk and extremities.[60]

Mild hemorrhagic manifestations, including petechiae on the palate and gingival bleeding, may be observed in some cases.[60] These symptoms last 2–3 days and usually heals with desquamation within 1 week.[60] Vertical transmission of the virus may be teratogenic to the fetal nervous system.[4] Affected pregnant women who conceive babies with adverse congenital outcomes, such as fetal death, craniofacial disproportion, microcephaly, and macular atrophy, are four times more likely to have a history of a rash during pregnancy.[61]

Histopathological findings are nonspecific and may vary according to the biopsied lesions.[62] Classic maculopapular eruptions showed a nonspecific mild to moderate lymphocytic dermal infiltrate, often perivascular and superficial.[62]

A diagnosis of Zika virus infection can be made through virus isolation from an appropriate specimen, detection of viral RNA by RT-PCR or nucleic acid amplification tests (<14 days after symptomonset), or the detection of IgM (≥14 days after onset of symptoms).[63] When diagnostic testing is performed with RT-PCR, urine instead of serum can be a better specimen due to a higher load of viruses and a longer duration for detection.[64]


  Conclusion Top


Summary of the information of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention[55],[65] and this review is provided in [Table 1]. A flowchart [Figure 7] with diagnostic clues summarizes the characteristic findings of febrile diseases caused by RNA viruses. Cutaneous manifestations can be categorized into maculopapular, petechial or purpuric, and papulovesicular exanthems. Characteristics of fever, prodromal symptoms, and distribution of the rashes can further distinguish diseases from others. Serologic and virological tests are recommended before making a definitive diagnosis. The outbreak of novel viruses, for instance, COVID-19, warrants further investigations for their dermatological presentation.
Table 1: Summary of the symptoms and diagnostic tools for febrile diseases caused by ribonucleic acid viruses

Click here to view
Figure 7: Diagnostic clues of characteristic presentations of febrile diseases caused by RNA viruses. COVID-19: Coronavirus disease 2019, GI: Gastrointestinal, HFMD: Hand-foot-and-mouth disease, HIV: Human immunodeficiency virus, HTLV: Human T-lymphotropic virus

Click here to view


Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Kuba Y, Kyan H, Iha Y, Kato T, Oyama M, Miyahira M, et al. Emergent measles-containing vaccination recommendation for aged 6-11 months and detection of vaccine-associated measles during a large measles outbreak in Okinawa, Japan, in 2018. Vaccine 2020;38:2361-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Mason PJ, Haddow AJ. An epidemic of virus disease in Southern Province, Tanganyika Territory, in 1952-53; an additional note on Chikungunya virus isolations and serum antibodies. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1957;51:238-40.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Krishnan M, Rahul, Krishnamoorthy. Chikungunya myeloradiculopathy: A rare complication. J Glob Infect Dis 2012;4:207-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Martinez JD, Garza JAC, Cuellar-Barboza A. Going viral 2019: Zika, chikungunya, and dengue. Dermatol Clin 2019;37:95-105.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Riyaz N, Riyaz A, Rahima., Abdul Latheef EN, Anitha PM, Aravindan KP, et al. Cutaneous manifestations of chikungunya during a recent epidemic in Calicut, north Kerala, south India. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2010;76:671-6.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
6.
Singal A, Pandhi D. Isolated nail pigmentation associated with chikungunya: A hitherto unreported manifestation. Skin Appendage Disord 2018;4:312-4.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Pakran J, George M, Riyaz N, Arakkal R, George S, Rajan U, et al. Purpuric macules with vesiculobullous lesions: A novel manifestation of Chikungunya. Int J Dermatol 2011;50:61-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Kumar R, Sharma MK, Jain SK, Yadav SK, Singhal AK. Cutaneous manifestations of chikungunya fever: Observations from an outbreak at a tertiary care hospital in Southeast Rajasthan, India. Indian Dermatol Online J 2017;8:336-42.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
9.
Korman AM, Alikhan A, Kaffenberger BH. Viral exanthems: An update on laboratory testing of the adult patient. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017;76:538-50.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, et al. Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA 2020;323:1061-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Recalcati S. Cutaneous manifestations in COVID-19: a first perspective. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2020;34:e212-3.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Le Syndicat National des Dermatologues-Vénéréologues (SNDV) Alerte Sur les Manifestations Cutanées du COVID 1. 2020; 6 April, 2020. Available from: https://www.syndicatdermatos.org/communique/communique-de-presse-06-04-20-covid19-et-peau/. [Last accessed on 2 June, 2020]  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Zhang Y, Cao W, Xiao M, Li YJ, Yang Y, Zhao J, et al. Clinical and coagulation characteristics of 7 patients with critical COVID-2019 pneumonia and acro-ischemia. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 2020;41:E006.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Mazzotta F, Troccoli T. Acute Acro-ischemia in the Child at the Time of COVID-19. 2020. Available from: https://www.fip-ifp.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/acroischemia-ENG.pdf. [Last accessed on 2 June, 2020]  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Yao XH, Li TY, He ZC, Ping YF, Liu HW, Yu SC, et al. A pathological report of three COVID-19 cases by minimal invasive autopsies. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi 2020;49:411-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Zhang Y, Xiao M, Zhang S, Xia P, Cao W, Jiang W, et al. Coagulopathy and antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with covid-19. N Engl J Med 2020;382:e38.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Simmons CP, Farrar JJ, van Vinh Chau N, Wills B. Dengue. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1423-32.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Thomas EA, John M, Kanish B. Mucocutaneous manifestations of Dengue fever. Indian J Dermatol 2010;55:79-85.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
19.
Scully C, Samaranayake LP. Emerging and changing viral diseases in the new millennium. Oral Dis 2016;22:171-9.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Huang HW, Tseng HC, Lee CH, Chuang HY, Lin SH. Clinical significance of skin rash in dengue fever: A focus on discomfort, complications, and disease outcome. Asian Pac J Trop Med 2016;9:713-8.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Halstead SB, Cohen SN. Dengue hemorrhagic Fever at 60 years: Early evolution of concepts of causation and treatment. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2015;79:281-91.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Chang K, Huang CH, Lee IK, Lu PL, Lin CY, Chen TC, et al. Differences in mortality and clinical manifestations of dengue hemorrhagic fever in Taiwan in different years: A comparison for cases in 2014 and 2015 epidemics. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2017;97:361-8.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Yu HS, Wang MT, Tai CL, Yang SA, Chien CH. Skin eruption and histopathological changes in dengue fever. Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi 1989;5:17-23.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Muller DA, Depelsenaire AC, Young PR. Clinical and laboratory diagnosis of dengue virus infection. J Infect Dis 2017;215:S89-95.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Blattner CM, Mortazie MB, Murase JE. Cutaneous manifestations of the Ebola virus. Dermatol Online J 2015;21:19.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Nkoghe D, Leroy EM, Toung-Mve M, Gonzalez JP. Cutaneous manifestations of filovirus infections. Int J Dermatol 2012;51:1037-43.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Leroy EM, Baize S, Volchkov VE, Fisher-Hoch SP, Georges-Courbot MC, Lansoud-Soukate J, et al. Human asymptomatic Ebola infection and strong inflammatory response. Lancet 2000;355:2210-5.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Nicastri E, Kobinger G, Vairo F, Montaldo C, Mboera LE, Ansunama R, et al. Ebola virus disease: Epidemiology, clinical features, management, and prevention. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2019;33:953-76.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Zaki SR, Shieh WJ, Greer PW, Goldsmith CS, Ferebee T, Katshitshi J, et al. A novel immunohistochemical assay for the detection of Ebola virus in skin: Implications for diagnosis, spread, and surveillance of Ebola hemorrhagic fever. Commission de Lutte contre les Epidémies à Kikwit. J Infect Dis 1999;179 Suppl 1:S36-47.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Kaminska K, Martinetti G, Lucchini R, Kaya G, Mainetti C. Coxsackievirus A6 and hand, foot and mouth disease: Three case reports of familial child-to-immunocompetent adult transmission and a literature review. Case Rep Dermatol 2013;5:203-9.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Feder HM Jr., Bennett N, Modlin JF. Atypical hand, foot, and mouth disease: A vesiculobullous eruption caused by Coxsackie virus A6. Lancet Infect Dis 2014;14:83-6.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Second J, Velter C, Calès S, Truchetet F, Lipsker D, Cribier B. Clinicopathologic analysis of atypical hand, foot, and mouth disease in adult patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017;76:722-9.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Böer-Auer A, Metze D. Histopathology of hand-foot-mouth disease in adults and criteria for differentiation from erythema multiforme. Am J Dermatopathol 2019;41:273-80.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Wang SY, Lin TL, Chen HY, Lin TS. Early and rapid detection of enterovirus 71 infection by an IgM-capture ELISA. J Virol Methods 2004;119:37-43.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Wang C, Chen Y, Xu T, Tian X, Zheng J, Liu W, et al. A novel method to diagnose the infection of enterovirus A71 in children by detecting IgA from saliva. J Med Virol. 2020;92:1059-64.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Archimbaud C, Chambon M, Bailly JL, Petit I, Henquell C, Mirand A, et al. Impact of rapid enterovirus molecular diagnosis on the management of infants, children, and adults with aseptic meningitis. J Med Virol 2009;81:42-8.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Lapins J, Gaines H, Lindbäck S, Lidbrink P, Emtestam L. Skin and mucosal characteristics of symptomatic primary HIV-1 infection. AIDS Patient Care STDS 1997;11:67-70.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Calikoglu E, Soravia-Dunand VA, Perriard J, Saurat JH, Borradori L. Acute genitocrural intertrigo: A sign of primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. Dermatology 2001;203:171-3.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Brehmer-Andersson E, Torssander J. The exanthema of acute (primary) HIV infection. Identification of a characteristic histopathological picture&? Acta Derm Venereol 1990;70:85-7.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Francis N. Non-neoplastic, cutaneous and mucocutaneous manifestations of HIV infection. Histopathology 1993;23:297-305.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Hurt CB, Nelson JAE, Hightow-Weidman LB, Miller WC. Selecting an HIV Test: A narrative review for clinicians and researchers. Sex Transm Dis 2017;44:739-46.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Ho DD, Sarngadharan MG, Resnick L, Dimarzoveronese F, Rota TR, Hirsch MS. Primary human T-lymphotropic virus type III infection. Ann Intern Med 1985;103:880-3.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Lindskov R, Lindhardt BO, Weismann K, Thomsen K, Bang F, Ulrich K, et al. Acute HTLV-III infection with roseola-like rash. Lancet 1986;1:447.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Wantzin GR, Lindhardt BO, Weismann K, Ulrich K. Acute HTLV III infection associated with exanthema, diagnosed by seroconversion. Br J Dermatol 1986;115:601-6.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Bialecki C, Feder HM, Jr., Grant-Kels JM. The six classic childhood exanthems: A review and update. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989;21:891-903.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Griffin DE. The immune response in measles: Virus control, clearance and protective immunity. Viruses 2016;8:282.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Xavier S, Forgie SED. Koplik spots revisited. CMAJ 2015;187:600.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Liersch J, Omaj R, Schaller J. Histopathological and immunohistochemical characteristics of measles exanthema: A study of a series of 13 adult cases and review of the literature. Am J Dermatopathol 2019;41:914-23.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Kjeldsberg CR, Kim H. Polykaryocytes resembling Warthin-Finkeldey giant cells in reactive and neoplastic lymphoid disorders. Hum Pathol 1981;12:267-72.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Kamel OW, LeBrun DP, Berry GJ, Dorfman RF, Warnke RA. Warthin-Finkeldey polykaryocytes demonstrate a T-cell immunophenotype. Am J Clin Pathol 1992;97:179-83.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Measles, Rubella and CRS: Disease Description, Epidemiology and Diagnosis. Surveillance Guidelines for Measles, Rubella and Congenital Rubella Syndrome in the WHO European Region: Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Di Lernia V, Ricci C. Skin manifestations with Rotavirus infections. Int J Dermatol 2006;45:759-61.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Tang C, Scaramangas-Plumley D, Nast CC, Mosenifar Z, Edelstein MA, Weisman M. A case of henoch-schonlein purpura associated with rotavirus infection in an elderly Asian male and review of the literature. Am J Case Rep 2017;18:136-42.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.
Makis A, Stavrou S, Chaliasos N, Zioga A, Vlahos AP, Gaitanis G, et al. Acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis (Sweet's syndrome) in a child, associated with a rotavirus infection: A case report. J Med Case Rep 2010;4:281.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.
Hamborsky J, Kroger A, Wolfe S, editors. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Epidemiology and Prevention of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases. 13th ed.. Washington D.C.: Public Health Foundation; 2015.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.
Ikeda Y, Ogura M, Nagata S, Sueki H, Fujisawa R, Iijima M. Histological and virological analysis of measles and rubella rash. Showa Igakkai Zasshi 1998;58:248-55.  Back to cited text no. 56
    
57.
Dimech W, Panagiotopoulos L, Marler J, Laven N, Leeson S, Dax EM. Evaluation of three immunoassays used for detection of anti-rubella virus immunoglobulin M antibodies. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2005;12:1104-8.  Back to cited text no. 57
    
58.
Abernathy E, Cabezas C, Sun H, Zheng Q, Chen M-h, Castillo-Solorzano C, et al. Confirmation of rubella within 4 days of rash onset: comparison of rubella virus RNA detection in oral fluid with immunoglobulin m detection in serum or oral fluid. J Clin Microbiol 2009;47:182.  Back to cited text no. 58
    
59.
Heggie AD. Pathogenesis of the rubella exanthem: Distribution of rubella virus in the skin during rubella with and without rash. J Infect Dis 1978;137:74-7.  Back to cited text no. 59
    
60.
Derrington SM, Cellura AP, McDermott LE, Gubitosi T, Sonstegard AM, Chen S, et al. Mucocutaneous Findings and Course in an Adult With Zika Virus Infection. JAMA Dermatol 2016;152:691-3.  Back to cited text no. 60
    
61.
van den Worm L, Khumalo NP. Skin manifestations are common and associated with a higher prevalence of congenital abnormalities in Zika virus infection. Int J Dermatol 2017;56:1470-3.  Back to cited text no. 61
    
62.
Paniz-Mondolfi AE, Blohm GM, Hernandez-Perez M, Larrazabal A, Moya D, Marquez M, et al. Cutaneous features of Zika virus infection: A clinicopathological overview. Clin Exp Dermatol 2019;44:13-9.  Back to cited text no. 62
    
63.
Landry ML, St George K. Laboratory diagnosis of Zika virus infection. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2017;141:60-7.  Back to cited text no. 63
    
64.
Brasil P, Pereira JP, Jr., Moreira ME, Ribeiro Nogueira RM, Damasceno L, Wakimoto M, et al. Zika virus infection in pregnant women in Rio de Janeiro. N Engl J Med 2016;375:2321-34.  Back to cited text no. 64
    
65.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC Yellow Book 2020: Health Information for International Travel. New York: Oxford University Press; 2017.  Back to cited text no. 65
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Chikungunya Virus
Covid-19
Dengue Virus
Ebola Virus
Hand-Foot-And-Mo...
Human Immunodefi...
Human T-Lymphotr...
Measles (Rubeola)
Rotavirus
Rubella (German ...
Zika Virus
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed282    
    Printed6    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded51    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal